Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ada O's avatar

I really appreciate the idea of midwifery over mastery. I’ve always felt alienated, frightened, by educational spaces that encourage us to “master.” (This was from an early age: I can remember a ballet class I tried when I was about 4 that I refused to go back to. I learned deep anxiety and disconnection from myself during high school years in large part because of an intensity around mastery.) As an educator, I hate the rhetoric, standards, and tools that emphasize children’s “mastery” of knowledge and skills. Let’s not train children to seek to master. Midwifery seems to center inquiry, process, emergence, and growth—or, not even to “center,” since that’s a concept with the same white EuroWestern lineage as “mastery”…maybe I’d say to “radiate.”

One thing I wondered as I read your post was about “softness” as a quality we can use to characterize relationships, communities, and structures, not only individuals.

Expand full comment
B B's avatar

I'm not even sure where to start with all the places that this resonates. Maybe I'll begin by saying that the very question about the possibility of being a "soft Black woman" feel frightening (folks kill shift things, especially if they're Black); vulnerable (don't be telling all these people that we have soft inside of us!); desirable (I honestly just want folks to see me as soft and take care of my softness, in all its forms, WAY MORE than they ever do); and vocationally descriptive on a very personal level (ask me how much time I spend searching out and curling up on soft things as the current daily pursuit of my body 😄).

To that last point: I'll happily refer you to two lovely and affordable weighted blankets I purchased earlier this year, if you haven't already bought yours.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts